John Mahama prays Supreme Court for a live telecast of his election petition hearing

John Dramani Mahama, the official applicant of the National Democratic Congress has requested of the Supreme Court of Ghana for a live broadcast of his political decision appeal hearings.

Insight for the solicitor will supplicate the court today beginning from about 9:30am to permit a live transmission in opposition to the show that court matters are not transmission live or recorded.

As per Mahama, the live broadcast will be in light of a legitimate concern for decency as a comparative transmission was finished during the 2012 political race appeal by Nana Akufo-Addo, presently president.

Mahama prayed: “that counsel for and in the interest of the solicitor will move this Honorable Court for a request coordinating live transmission of the entire of the procedures in this appeal upon the grounds contained in the going with affidavit…or different requests as the Honorable Court may consider fit”.

The entire country is relied upon to get energized when the Supreme Court gives this solicitation on Thursday, January 14, when the court holds the main knowing about the case.

It is broadly anticipated that the insight for the first and second respondents, specifically the Electoral Commission and Nana Akufo-Addo individually, won’t restrict this movement since it involves tremendous public interest.

Per Rule 69C (4) of C.I. 99, “arrangement is made for the procedures of the court to be sent live if the court so decides”, and 4(a)(b) and (c) accommodates the excusal of an appeal where the applicant neglects to document the cycles in regards to the request, “inside the time indicated by law or to hear and decide the request where the respondents neglect to record their answers or neglect to record their cycles in regards to their answer inside the predefined time”.

In the interim, the Supreme Court will hear a movement by counsel for previous President John Dramani Mahama, imploring leave of the court to revise the political decision appeal on grounds of typographical blunders which stirred up first and second respondents in quite a while.

The error, as expressed in the movement was in alleviation (f) of the political decision appeal.

Alleviation (f) is looking for “a request for compulsory order guiding the main respondent to continue to direct a second political decision with solicitor and first respondent as the competitors as needed under Articles 63(4) and (5) of the 1992 Constitution”.

The rerun ought to rather be between the principal solicitor and the subsequent respondent, who is Nana Akufo-Addo.

please share and comment below.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

%d bloggers like this: